‘Open Science’ vs. Traditional Peer-Review Journals Debated in NYT Article

A recent New York Times article highlights differing opinions on whether medical/scientific publishing would benefit from more open/social models compared to the traditional peer-review “gatekeeping” approach:

http://snipurl.com/21shrp0
(many of the comments at NYT are more interesting than the article!)

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply